Coalition’s International Publicity of Canada’s Dysfunctionalities Imminent
and
Why Concomitant Military Intervention is Justified and Absolutely Necessary
© 2010 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
It was only a matter of time before the partnership would conclude back-channel diplomacy was inefficacious and adopt another approach to containing China’s unlawful global ambitions and fixing Canada’s dysfunctionalities that advance them. When the RCC wasn’t effective in triggering domestic regime change it then became incumbent on those whose elected office job description involves protecting national and economic security and others with much to lose to challenge the Chinada threat with other methodologies.
It started in August 2010 and became more pronounced during subsequent months – articulations by more and more partners there would be an international awareness campaign alerting the world to the Beijing leadership’s violation of Canadian sovereignty, the complicity of Canadian political and corporate movers in that malfeasance, Chinada’s global imperialistic ambitions and the militarization and institutionalization of violations of domestic and international human rights law in the form of stealth cognition technologies R&D, deployment and proliferation.
A recent articulation of this approach came from Irish Prime Minster Cowan. He was signalled he was in the diplomatic corridor during a live BBC broadcast of a financial crisis press conference on November 22nd. He effected a lexiconic gesture to the word “publicize”.
[1:30: Colbert M.] The government will publicize its four-year plan next Wednesday.
Just before President Obama left for the NATO Summit in Lisbon Portugal he met with three former Secretaries of State and two former Secretaries of Defense. Was this to only discuss the proposed U.S.-Russian START treaty in advance of the Summit, or also a brain trust assemblage of knowledge, experience and informed intuition to discuss the issue of military intervention in Canada led by the U.S. and have opinions ready for discussion with NATO coalition partners?*
The meeting included [Vice-President] Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-MA), ranking Republican Sen. Richard Lugar (R-IN), former Secretaries of State Madeleine Albright, James Baker, and Henry Kissinger, former Secretaries of Defense William Cohen and William Perry, former National Security Advisor Gen. Brent Scowcroft, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. James Cartwright, and former Sen. Sam Nunn.
Source: Foreign Policy Magazine, November 18, 2010
* What followed this meeting is documented in NATO Alliance Members Shall “Stand Together and Defend One Another Against the Threats to Our Security [by Chinada]”; and Joint Chiefs Chairman Michael Mullen Describes Chinada Principals as “Dangerous” and Takes as Credible the Threat to Proliferate Stealth Cognition Technologies
News of this methodology of achieving stated objectives reached the Office of the internationally delegitimzed prime minister by the next Question Period. On November 23rd he employed the lexicon and to the same word as the Irish leader; but not before articulating how outraged he and the Chinada High Command are that they face military intervention – which is just like Hitler and Mussolini, the Soviets in Vietnam and other aggressors demanding their adversaries terminate their defensive posture:
Mr. Speaker [10:24: Paulson M.] let me just make it perfectly clear that Canada condemns without reservation the artillery attack by North Korea on the South Korean island.
[...]
We urge North Korea to refrain from further reckless and belligerent [10:48: Brown M.] provocations...
[...]
Well Mr. Speaker [13:05: Paulson M.] I would urge the leader of the NDP to take [Soledad M.] a look at the quarterly reports the government [13:11: British Parlia M.] publishes on the Afghan mission.
The critical question is whether global condemnation will be sufficient to dislodge malfeasant parties from their perches atop the country’s power and wealth pyramid. It’s undeniable on the diplomacy record that the original Triple “E” formulation of change, the first two constituents being ‘encirclement’ and ‘embarrassment’, not only had no effect, it emboldened them to persist with their nefarious policies and practices. Then in early 2010 they bragged they were closet Satanists.
The Fiefdom treatise research treatise exposed and the Custodian Chief’s nationwide public and private sector edification campaign and triggering all accountability mechanisms corroborated how firmly embedded their interests are in the fabric of the parliamentary system, the economy, military, intelligence and security communities, law enforcement and the administration of justice. And they proved themselves to be resilient to what the coalition undertook.
An approach that involves achieving what the RCC failed at, namely a national awareness of systemic corruption, criminality and human rights violations, through an international edification campaign without more would trigger elections in Canada and the status quo mobilizing its wealth, influence, security apparatus assets and the Chinese military to ensure results that prevent fundamental reform.
The only reason why the Conservatives won in January 2006 was because there were slightly more unrecruited Canadians in the electoral voting pool who reacted to the Liberal Sponsorship Scandal than those who serve the Chinada High Command. And look what happened when Harper took office – ratified and continued to strengthen policies and practices that violate domestic and international law in the face of American and then global condemnation.
The coalition has twice condemned on the diplomatic record the country’s electoral process as fraudulent:
Vacating Canada’s 2006 Federal Election on the Grounds its Results
Were Obtained by Institutional Fraud and Undue
Influence by a Foreign Government
© 2006 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
The Triple “E” coalition vacated Canada’s 2006 federal election outcome and by implication every provincial and municipal election on the Fiefdom treatise evidence that all the results were obtained by fraud and illegal interference by the Government of the Peoples Republic of China.
Two long-standing fundamental principles of modern democracy are that a citizenry freely chooses amongst a selection of political parties and whomever obtains a majority forms the next government and a foreign government is not allowed to intervene in a way that materially affects the outcome. Therefore, logically when there is only one party and the population through a grand deception is led to believe the political parties are independent and additionally there is a secret influence being applied by a foreign government, then all election results are obtained by fraud. For had the voters known they were casting ballots for the same group of politicians and a foreign government was manipulating the electoral process they would realize they were not living in a politically pluralistic and democratic society but a one-party, a totalitarian, state.
During the December 1, 2006 ‘NBC Nightly News’, Brian – attired in the lexiconic colors of punishment certainty and justice – introduced a segment on the dynamics of the Mexican federal election. That news item was geo-politicized to generate the communiqué that the international community was not going to recognize election results in the country on the grounds that the political parties in practice are indistinguishable and China had unduly influenced the outcome. This is an important step because refusing to recognize the election as valid is one of several issues that is related to the issue of governance legitimacy.
This specific message was communicated employing the lexicon. Producers timed Brian’s voiceover – “election was fraudulent” – to a clip presumably of a Mexican congressman executing a protracted quasi-Clooney Maneuver.
The Fiefdom treatise argued in December 2004 that the evidence was undeniable Canada’s three major political parties, the Liberal Party of Canada, the Conservative Party of Canada and the New Democratic Party of Canada, were in reality one political party: Why Both the Liberal and Conservative Political Parties are Culpable and Liable for Atrocities Committed in by and for the Last Democratic Fiefdom. (Now the ‘factionless governance’ analysis – Section V).
There was more proof they were all fused at the hip when after the 2006 federal election the new Conservative government failed to take any action to curb the violation of international or Canadian domestic law.
‘NBC Nightly News’: The Coalition Calls Canada’s Elections “Fraudulent”
© 2008 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
There was no denying or equivocating what the coalition stated using the lexicon on the diplomatic record during the June 29, 2008 broadcast of the ‘NBC Nightly News’.
In Ned Colt’s segment on the ‘coronation’ of the Zimbabwe dictator, the following was observed:
Today some of the handful of elections observers allowed in [2:24*: clip: observer Federer M.] called the election fraudulent.
* digits add up to a China identifying eight
The intent was to denounce elections in Canada as shams because of the factionless nature of the country’s federal, provincial and municipal system of governance1. The lack of political pluralism combined with a secret street soldier army numbering between three to five million that votes en masse for the Liberals steals the country’s elections from thirty million who have been mislead into believing their votes count for something, when they don’t at all.
Beyond there being full justification under the NATO Alliance constitution and U.N. Charter for military intervention in Canada, coalition partners cannot but recall and feel constrained by the international vitriol that was triggered by the invasion of Iraq. The principal regime changers, U.S. and U.K., took credibility hits at home and abroad. However, now years later where is that anger? It no longer exists because the world has moved on. This is the kind of circumstance that ought to weigh heavily on the coalition leadership’s evaluations of whether to authorize this kind of methodology in Canada.
Undoubtedly they and other partners will be originally viewed as doing the unthinkable. Why? Because the world’s bought into the manufactured façade of democracy. Fully deconstructing it with a carefully strategized edification campaign will temper negative sentiments because logic and fear will kick in and people in every country will be outraged by Chinada’s Pandora’s Box, stealth cognition technologies, viewing them as nuclear weapons were last century. Those who cherish their privacy – personal, professional and corporate – will see what 20 plus years of R&D achieved as a threat to them and predict Chinada spreading its global sphere of control and influence their sociopathic pubescence, political schadenfreude and sexual perversion eventually reaching them, their families and grandchildren.
Billions will view the proliferation of Satanism, totalitarian political and corporate cultures, racism, prosperity embezzlement and militarized and institutionalized enslavement, experimentation and torture as intolerable and demand they be protected.
The Custodian Chief’s argument on November 23rd that military procured regime change is necessary resonated within the coalition. During the first segment of the ABC News on November 24th that very point was made. A clip of an airline passenger executing a choreographed lexiconic gesture was edited to immediately precede a clip of a scene containing the lexiconic representations for condemnation and prison certainty [clip 1]; followed by a soldier in uniform [clip 2] – timed to the communiqué that millions of street soldiers and Chinese military and intelligence assets can’t stop the coalition’s military forces from effecting regime change.
[0:41: Beckinsale-Clinton M.x2] Across the country millions of passengers didn't let this [clip 1] stand in the way of [clip 2] this.
And in that same category of reality, on November 26, 2010 the ‘CBS Evening News’ turned its segment on North Korea’s aggression into a communiqué delivery medium about the true nature of relations between the coalition and Chinada; employing a double Taylor Identifier to red flag just how close matters are to authorizing the military intervention methodology of regime change. A clip of a naval vessel was used because it contains the call letters 76.
[North Korea] charged that upcoming U.S. naval exercises with [8:23: TI] South Korea would bring the peninsula to the brink of war.
.
An inevitable arrest communiqué was embedded in a November 28th ABC news segment. It was about the attempted terrorist bombing of a Portland Christmas tree lighting ceremony. Producers added a child protection theme by editing-in a clip of a little girl on her daddy’s shoulders effecting a Clooney Maneuver.
The FBI took [1:44: Cl.M.] great caution to ensure the arrest was planned in a way to ensure public safety.
It’s conceivable that so many will be livid at having been duped into believing Canada was an enviable democracy – as opposed to a militarized totalitarian regime with a Satanic core bent on triggering a second Dark Ages – they’ll more than support regime change, they’ll insist on it.
But as argued even if they don’t, in a couple-three years they’ll forget all about it as they’ve moved on. Coalition partners’ reputations will naturally mend, stated objectives will have been achieved and the world will be a safer, more secure and prosperous place.
